July 31, 2009 (CHICAGO, IL) The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008, which goes into effect on October 3, 2009, is a source of concern for employers that are worried about the impending increase in their health care costs. The legislation prohibits group health or self-insured plans covering more than 50 employees from imposing caps or limitations on mental health treatment or substance use benefits that are not also applied to medical and surgical benefits. Because of this, many employers will have to increase the mental health and substance abuse (MH/SA) coverage in their existing benefit plan(s) to comply with the new parity requirements.
With most organizations looking to reduce expenses as a result of the current economic climate, any cost increase at all can be detrimental to the company’s short- and long-term financial viability.
For organizations that continue to provide MH/SA coverage, their Employee Assistance Program (EAP) may have some plan design options that can mitigate the financial impact of the Act. One of those options, an MH/SA Gatekeeper, benefits both employers and plan participants by redirecting EAP-appropriate cases into the Employee Assistance Program, while guiding members with acute mental health or substance abuse needs to the appropriate in-network provider within the benefit plan.
“Even after the Mental Health Parity Act goes into effect, companies that use their EAP to act as a ‘first stop’ for employees accessing MH/SA services may actually see their health care costs go down,” says John Kamilis, LCPC, Clinical Director of CuraLinc Healthcare (www.curalinc.com). “Our experience shows that an EAP with an MH/SA Gatekeeper should have a direct financial offset of 1-to-1 or better. However, the key to success with this model is ensuring that the EAP provider is committed to addressing short-term counseling cases within the program.”
The Gatekeeper service takes direct aim at MH/SA costs in two ways:
Mindee Zis, Senior Account Executive at Allied Benefit Systems, Inc., a Chicago-based Third Party Administrator, has seen the impact of the EAP/Gatekeeper model first-hand. “Our clients with an integrated EAP/Gatekeeper model are experiencing EAP case utilization that is two-to-three times higher than we have seen from programs without the Gatekeeper component. If this model weren’t in place, many of these additional cases would have gone into the plan with an average cost ranging from $126.00 to over $900.00 per case. After the Parity legislation goes into effect, we believe that the savings will be demonstrated even more dramatically for companies that continue to provide coverage for MH/SA services.”