Once focusing primarily on employee problems stemming
from alcohol and substance abuse, employee assistance programs (EAP) have
greatly expanded their scope. Developments such as the rise of child care and
elder care concerns, stricter interpretations of the Americans with
Disabilities Act, the decline in employee loyalty, and an increase of violence
in the workplace have prompted employers to look at their EAPs in a new light. Â Today´s EAPs address a myriad of personal,
lifestyle, and work-related issues --- basically any type of personal concern
--- that can impact employee productivity.
If employees went to the EAP
solely for drug and alcohol problems, the program would be greatly under-utilized. Â This expanded focus is likely to be a
primary contributor to the growth of EAPs in the US --- with the number of EAPs
doubling since 1991. Statistics show that the employee assistance industry has
grown from just 450 EAPs nationwide in 1970 to 20,000 today. And EAP enrollment
increased nearly 80% from 1994 to 1998.
EAPs help achieve organizational goals
Most organizations agree that to compete in today´s
increasingly competitive global marketplace, employers must achieve the dual
goal of retaining talent and controlling costs. The growth of EAPs can be
largely attributed to their ability to help employers achieve these goals
simultaneously.
Rehabilitation of a valuable employee versus hiring
and training a new employee can result in substantial cost savings for
employers. EAPs cost employers only $20 to $30 per employee annually, but
highly respected studies also indicate that with active intervention, EAPs
lower costs by: Â
·       Â
Reducing employee turnover and absenteeism
·       Â
Reducing claims for long-term disability, worker´s
compensation, accidents, grievances, and theft
·       Â
Reducing the number of legal actions against the employer
·       Â
Improving employee performance, productivity, morale,
concentration, and relationships with coworkers
·       Â
Reducing costs of medical plans, sick leave, and training
new hires.
The report Employee Assistance Programs, by the Work-Family Roundtable of the
Conference Board, confirmed the benefits achieved by using EAPs. Â The report found that the primary benefits
of EAPs are:
·       Â
Improved employee morale (68%)
·       Â
Increased productivity (62%)
·       Â
Decreased absenteeism (59%)
·       Â
Lower health costs (55%)
·       Â
Reduced turnover (35% )
·       Â
Decreased tardiness (33%)
·       Â
Reduced workplace violence (21%)
Monitoring the effectiveness of an EAP
In order to achieve these
goals, EAPs must be managed and monitored on a continuous basis. Â This is the only way to readily determine if
the programs are doing what they were intended to do --- namely reduce
turnover, absenteeism, and accidents, and enhance employee productivity and
commitment. Â After all, programs that do
not meet their objectives are of little value. Â
A Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Program is key
to the successful management of any EA. Implementing this type of
measurement-focused approach will compel a company to uncover ineffective
programs, decide whether to restructure or to replace them, and relate these
efforts to the bottom line.
The following are CQI indicators that an Employee
Assistance Program, Client Companies, or Â
Consultants could use to assess Â
and monitor the ongoing value of their current or proposed program:
·      Â
Access,
availability, and responsiveness of EAP counselors: How timely
is the telephone access to case managers? Â
How quickly are appointments scheduled for emergent clients?
·      Â
Types of
clinical services being sought: What is the number and type of the
high-risk cases such as threats of suicide, homicide, substance abuse, and
aggressive workplace behaviors?
·      Â
Client
satisfaction:. Â To evaluate
client satisfaction and efficiency of client care and services, companies need
to determine if their employees and managers satisfied with the EAP services
provided. Client, training, and account management surveys are used to
determine the satisfaction with and effectiveness of EAP services.
·      Â
Utilization
rates:. Â To determine
annual usage --- include over and under utilization
·       Clients
Rights: Â Clients should be well educated
about the services they receive.
·       Clinical
Care and Service: Ongoing
audits ensure accurate and appropriate case documentation, clinical care, and
risk management.
·       Training
and Education: The
training and educating of a client organization´s management staff and
employees (union officials when appropriate) is key to the effectiveness and
utilization of the EAP services.
·       Â
Outpatient mental health treatment results in
"reduction" of medical services utilization, particularly inpatient
services. Â The average 8.7 inpatient
hospital days (for all claimants) was reduced to 1.5 days for those receiving
mental health treatment (Blue Cross/Blue Shield studies).
·       Â
General Motors reported that use of the EAP generated a 72
percent reduction in dollar amount paid for accident and sickness disability
benefits for employees with substance abuse problems. In 1990, the company´s
employee assistance program saved $37 million per year in lost
productivity--$3,700 for each of the 10,000 employees enrolled in the program.
·       Â
Ford and General Motors report their EAPs save $9 for every
dollar spent.
·       Â
In 1998, Northrop saved $20,000 per rehabilitated employee
and saw productivity skyrocket 43%.
Once focusing primarily on employee problems stemming
from alcohol and substance abuse, employee assistance programs (EAP) have
greatly expanded their scope. Developments such as the rise of child care and
elder care concerns, stricter interpretations of the Americans with
Disabilities Act, the decline in employee loyalty, and an increase of violence
in the workplace have prompted employers to look at their EAPs in a new light. Â Today´s EAPs address a myriad of personal,
lifestyle, and work-related issues --- basically any type of personal concern
--- that can impact employee productivity.
If employees went to the EAP
solely for drug and alcohol problems, the program would be greatly under-utilized. Â This expanded focus is likely to be a
primary contributor to the growth of EAPs in the US --- with the number of EAPs
doubling since 1991. Statistics show that the employee assistance industry has
grown from just 450 EAPs nationwide in 1970 to 20,000 today. And EAP enrollment
increased nearly 80% from 1994 to 1998.
EAPs help achieve organizational goals
Most organizations agree that to compete in today´s
increasingly competitive global marketplace, employers must achieve the dual
goal of retaining talent and controlling costs. The growth of EAPs can be
largely attributed to their ability to help employers achieve these goals
simultaneously.
Rehabilitation of a valuable employee versus hiring
and training a new employee can result in substantial cost savings for
employers. EAPs cost employers only $20 to $30 per employee annually, but
highly respected studies also indicate that with active intervention, EAPs
lower costs by: Â
·       Â
Reducing employee turnover and absenteeism
·       Â
Reducing claims for long-term disability, worker´s
compensation, accidents, grievances, and theft
·       Â
Reducing the number of legal actions against the employer
·       Â
Improving employee performance, productivity, morale,
concentration, and relationships with coworkers
·       Â
Reducing costs of medical plans, sick leave, and training
new hires.
The report Employee Assistance Programs, by the Work-Family Roundtable of the
Conference Board, confirmed the benefits achieved by using EAPs. Â The report found that the primary benefits
of EAPs are:
·       Â
Improved employee morale (68%)
·       Â
Increased productivity (62%)
·       Â
Decreased absenteeism (59%)
·       Â
Lower health costs (55%)
·       Â
Reduced turnover (35% )
·       Â
Decreased tardiness (33%)
·       Â
Reduced workplace violence (21%)
Monitoring the effectiveness of an EAP
In order to achieve these
goals, EAPs must be managed and monitored on a continuous basis. Â This is the only way to readily determine if
the programs are doing what they were intended to do --- namely reduce
turnover, absenteeism, and accidents, and enhance employee productivity and
commitment. Â After all, programs that do
not meet their objectives are of little value. Â
A Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Program is key
to the successful management of any EA. Implementing this type of
measurement-focused approach will compel a company to uncover ineffective
programs, decide whether to restructure or to replace them, and relate these
efforts to the bottom line.
The following are CQI indicators that an Employee
Assistance Program, Client Companies, or Â
Consultants could use to assess Â
and monitor the ongoing value of their current or proposed program:
·      Â
Access,
availability, and responsiveness of EAP counselors: How timely
is the telephone access to case managers? Â
How quickly are appointments scheduled for emergent clients?
·      Â
Types of
clinical services being sought: What is the number and type of the
high-risk cases such as threats of suicide, homicide, substance abuse, and
aggressive workplace behaviors?
·      Â
Client
satisfaction:. Â To evaluate
client satisfaction and efficiency of client care and services, companies need
to determine if their employees and managers satisfied with the EAP services
provided. Client, training, and account management surveys are used to
determine the satisfaction with and effectiveness of EAP services.
·      Â
Utilization
rates:. Â To determine
annual usage --- include over and under utilization
·       Clients
Rights: Â Clients should be well educated
about the services they receive.
·       Clinical
Care and Service: Ongoing
audits ensure accurate and appropriate case documentation, clinical care, and
risk management.
·       Training
and Education: The
training and educating of a client organization´s management staff and
employees (union officials when appropriate) is key to the effectiveness and
utilization of the EAP services.
·       Â
Outpatient mental health treatment results in
"reduction" of medical services utilization, particularly inpatient
services. Â The average 8.7 inpatient
hospital days (for all claimants) was reduced to 1.5 days for those receiving
mental health treatment (Blue Cross/Blue Shield studies).
·       Â
General Motors reported that use of the EAP generated a 72
percent reduction in dollar amount paid for accident and sickness disability
benefits for employees with substance abuse problems. In 1990, the company´s
employee assistance program saved $37 million per year in lost
productivity--$3,700 for each of the 10,000 employees enrolled in the program.
·       Â
Ford and General Motors report their EAPs save $9 for every
dollar spent.
·       Â
In 1998, Northrop saved $20,000 per rehabilitated employee
and saw productivity skyrocket 43%.