FAQ-How to fairly distribute a corporate bonus?

Frequently asked ask[at]hr.com question concerning the distribution of bonuses.
FAQ - How to fairly distribute a corporate bonus

FAQ - How to fairly distribute a corporate bonus?

 

Q.   We have recently centralized the administration of our compensation programs.   In the past one section of our organization has always received a fairly generous bonus, while the rest of the organization has not.   Since the centralization of the compensation programs, we have been at a loss as to how to properly deal with this situation.   Should we continue to give out the bonus based on past practice, but provide it to everyone in the company at a lesser amount? We feel that this will cause problems with the people who are used to receiving a larger sum.   Or should we cancel the bonus program all together?

 

A.   It is important that you (and others!) are aware that there is no real solution to this.   Either you treat the company as one unit and then those who got a bonus in the past "lose out" or you carry on with the status quo, and the sense of being one company with a centralized compensation scheme is discredited.

 

Every side will come up with reasonable arguments as to why it is "fair" that they get the money.

 

So rather than focusing on "the right answer", I''d worry about the right process for getting management and staff on the same side.   You should definitely present the case to senior management, explain the options, explain there''s no way everyone will be happy, and facilitate them to a position they are happy with.

 

In a high involvement organization (the best kind), you would also get feedback from staff.   You will have to be sure that this revolves around an intelligent discussion of "what is best for the organization".

 

Once management has worked itself into consensus and acceptance, then the next step will be to communicate the decision to the organization.   I suggest in the communication to give the decision and the reason, and note the reasonable objections without being apologetic.

 

As HR your main role will be to facilitate agreement but you need to have a position as to what is your first choice.   I prefer simply eliminating the bonus but I could easily argue in favor of the other alternatives.   Whatever you choose I think it important that you help people keep their sense of perspective.   As long as the decision has a reasonable rationale, and as long as it is communicated honestly and carefully, then nothing much will happen.   Fears of people leaving en masse are usually overstated.

 

I''d also point out to management that there are real problems with centralizing and that the bonus issue may be just a lightning rod.   Rather than getting too worked up about the bonus they need to ask how they will help the people adapt to the new structure.

 

The HR industry´s premier online community and resource for Human Resource professionals: HR, human resources, HR community, human resources community, HR best practices, best practices in human resources, online communities for HR, HR articles, HR news, human resources articles, human resources news, HR events, leadership, performance management, staffing and recruitment, benefits, compensation, staffing, recruitment, workforce acquisition, human capital management, HR management, human resources management, HR metrics and measurement, organizational development, executive coaching, HR law, employment law, labor relations, hiring employees, HR outsourcing, human resources outsourcing, training and development
hr.com. human resources management resources for hr professionals. | HR menus | HR events | HR Sitemap