The traditional approach to
work-life dilemmas is to develop a corporate policy or program that will
accommodate the individual needs of employees. To some degree these policies
and programs have become yet one more HR entitlement. Employees can feel
entitled to be able to use the telecommuting policy regardless of the nature of
their work. This holds true for part-time work or job share or flexible work
arrangements. Many managers thus resist these policies because they do not know
how to say no or they fear that if they let one-person work part-time everyone
will want to use the policy. The policy and program approach to solving
work-life dilemmas helps few employees, rarely considers the business needs and
often compromises customer needs.
Organizations and their
managers now have an alternative to the entitlement approach to work-life dilemmas.
Artemis Management Consultants helped spearhead a cutting-edge action research
project that transformed the work-life field. The Ford Foundation sponsored
three research teams: Artemis Management Consultants worked at Tandem
Computers. The Families and Work Institute worked at Corning and a team from
MIT´s Sloan Graduate School of Business worked at Xerox. Our goal was to
determine what the cultural barriers were that prevented employees from
utilizing the creative programs and policies that many organizations had
developed and had won recognition for the ´family-friendly´ organization. The
action research teams worked in each company to understand the cultural
barriers and to examine the habitual ways that work is structured.
As a result of this three
year, Ford Foundation sponsored research, organizations can now approach
work-life dilemmas as a core business strategy supporting the three bottom
lines: profitability, customer and employee satisfaction rather than an HR
entitlement program. HR staff can now work as business partners with the line
to facilitate finding systemic solutions to business problems. Â As a result of Artemis´ participation in the
research, we have written a workbook to teach managers and their teams how to
improve what we call the three bottom lines. Here are the basic tenets of the
new systemic approach that we call ReInventing Work.
     The basic tenets of
ReInventing Work:
1. Â Â Â Â Â
ReInventing Work teaches managers and their teams how
to challenge traditional cultural assumptions and how to redesign their
habitual work practices and structures so that the business results are
improved and customer satisfaction, along with employee satisfaction,
increases.
2. Â Â Â Â Â
A work group begins with a business dilemma - a
presenting problem that negatively impacts the business results as well as the
personal lives of employees.
3. Â Â Â Â Â
In essence, ReInventing Work is a systemic
intervention that helps organizations analyze the interdependencies in the
world of work and the world outside of work. Events are not isolated
occurrences. There is a connection and perhaps even interdependency between our
personal lives and our professional lives.
4. Â Â Â Â Â
The traditional stakeholder model is expanded not
only to include shareholders, suppliers, customers, and vendors, but also to
include the "family." Our "families" have a stake in the success or failure of
the businesses we work in. We use the term "families" with quotation marks to
indicate all those in our extended circle, not just the traditional
heterosexual, nuclear family.
5. Â Â Â Â Â
The goal of ReInventing Work is to improve the three
bottom lines in organizations: profitability or shareholder value, customer
satisfaction, and employee satisfaction.
6. Â Â Â Â Â
ReInventing Work uses traditional work redesign tools
but links them to all three bottom lines in a systemic change process.
Here is an example that
demonstrates the power of ReInventing Work:
A sales team had developed
the habit of staying up all night to get proposals ready for prospective
customers. They would be cheered in the morning by their manager and co-workers
for demonstrating their commitment to their work by staying up all night. Using
the ReInventing Work process, the group examined this cultural norm and work
practice. They came to realize that the practice was counter-productive to
achieving their business goals as well as their personal goals. They could not
produce their highest quality work at 3 A.M. For the next few days they were so
exhausted they did not work at maximum capacity. Thus, productivity was
diminished by the all-night practice. By staying at work all night, they also
missed personal time to exercise, be with friends and "family," or just renew
themselves by working on hobbies or reading a good novel.
The members of the work
group began to reward one another for leaving work at a reasonable hour and for
producing quality products and achieving their business goals. They no longer
applauded one another for working long hours. Soon their efficiency improved;
the quality of their proposals to prospective customers improved; and the staff
was no longer required to work extended hours. They were able to have a
personal life if they chose.
We have come to understand
that many of our work practices and the norms we set and reward one another for
are often as counter-productive to accomplishing our business goals as they are
to achieving our personal goals. We often use old stereotypes passed down from
parent to child, teacher to student, and advisor to advisee, to define what it
means to be a successful worker in the workplace. These stereotypes are often
outdated and frequently prevent us from achieving our personal and professional
goals.
     Corporation X had recently changed their business model to respond to changes in the competitive marketplace. Customer Engineers (CE´s), the hardware ´fix-it´ crew, were now required to wear beepers 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and to be at a customer´s site within two hours of the customer´s call for help. CEs were beginning to balk. Morale was dropping; the staff no longer had a personal life because they could not plan activities outside of the beeper range, and CEs were threatening to quit. Since CEs are highly skilled individuals, and the learning curve is a long one, the manager foresaw significant problems if a massive turnover took place. Moreover, since CEs on beepers were paid overtime, even if they did not go out on a call, the manager´s budget was being stretched to its maximum to meet the new business demands.
     It is important to note that it was a change in the business strategy that sparked a new challenge for the employees, their manager, and the Human Resources staff. The manager needed a business solution quickly, not a work/life program.
The
Presenting Problem.
The new requirement of 24
hour, 7-day availability was bankrupting the budget and becoming a burden,
because employees on beepers could not make personal plans that took them out
of beeper range on nights and weekends. Morale was low and staff were
threatening to leave the company.
Solution:
Using ReInventing Work strategies and tools, the work
group learned how to redesign their work structures and processes. They took
their current business challenges-the new requirement of a two-hour turn-around
time-and working as a team, brainstormed the ways in which they could solve
their personal dilemmas while also supporting the needs of the business. It
became clear to the team that a schedule change of some sort was necessary.
After considering a number of scheduling options, two CEs volunteered to go on
a three-day, twelve-hour schedule, from Friday through Sunday, 8 A.M. to 8
P.M., with an additional four hours on Monday morning,
Results:
·       Â
The other CEs in the office can now count on weekends
off.
·       Â
The customers now have a regular weekend CE, whom
they have come to know and trust.
·       Â
The "families" benefit because CEs on the weekend
shift are now able to be involved in their kids´ activities at school during
the week. The weekday CEs can make personal plans on the weekends knowing their
co-workers are covering that shift, and thus, no beepers are required.
·       Â
Overtime expenses have been reduced significantly.
·       Â
Employees, who were ready to leave because of the
excessive overtime required, have remained. Thus, recruitment and training
costs have been eliminated.
     ReInventing Work is a change process tool rather than a program, seminar, or training session. The intent of the process is to achieve organizational change one work group at a time. As organizational change consultants, we have supported for many years the trickle-down theory of change-convincing senior management to set a vision or issue an edict and then hoping that everyone will follow!
     One of the key learnings for us in the Ford Foundation research is that a work-life culture-change process needs to be systemic and to start with the individual, the co-workers, and the manager. We found in many cases that managers may be supportive of work/life issues but that individuals and their co-workers were beating themselves to death. We also learned that norms develop at the work-group level and that work processes and work structures are created at the work-group level. Thus, it is the work group that needs to examine how their behaviors impact the achievements of their business goals as well as their personal goals. It is the work group and their managers that have the ability to control and change many of their behaviors and practices. The CE example is a prime one. They did not need senior management´s permission to change their work schedules. They needed to examine their habitual work practices and understand how continuing to do the same thing they had done for years in a new business environment was not good for the business or for their personal lives. Organizations can, indeed, change one work group at a time.
     Intact teams have the ability to examine their cultural norms and their habitual work processes and determine for themselves a more effective way to accomplish their business goals while also supporting the personal needs of the staff. It is our experience that successes, like the CE division´s, are contagious. Other employees and line managers hear about the improved business environment in one work group and want to replicate the process in their own area.
     Here are some other examples of changes that were made by work groups and their managers as a result of their exposure to ReInventing Work:
The
Presenting Problem.
Employees were not using
their accrued leave time; burnout was becoming a concern for staff as well as
managers.
     Solutions
1. Â Â Â Â Â
In a sales division in the Midwest, all individual
development plans now include a section for the employee to complete,
indicating his or her plans for the use of Flexible Time Off. During
performance reviews, managers ask employees if their goals have been achieved,
and if not, why not. This encourages all employees to plan their personal time
off and then to be accountable for actually taking it. The managerial message
is: "Time off is important for you and the organization."
2. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
Employees in the same sales division identify
colleagues who can function as backups in their absence. It becomes easier to
take time off when someone is sick or for a vacation if the employee knows that
another person will handle the essential work.
3. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
This sales group has experimented with two other
changes. It has new norms for voice mail and electronic mail response time. It
has also agreed that staff and managers will no longer be expected to respond
on the weekends and on their vacation to voice mail and electronic mail.
4. Â Â Â Â Â
The sales group has an "assumption buster" award. At
staff meetings the members are encouraged to challenge one another when
traditional assumptions or habitual work processes prevent them from seeing new
business opportunities or affect their personal lives. They have given one
another permission to challenge the status quo. The assumption-buster award is
a lighthearted way to encourage the sales team to challenge what are usually
accepted as "givens." They are learning to ask new kinds of questions and to
innovate to benefit both the business and their personal lives.
The
Presenting Problem.
A Human Resources group was not meeting its deadlines
for long-term projects. Staff morale was down and concern about burnout was
rampant, because staff members were working long hours in an attempt to
complete their project work.
Solution:
The members of the HR group
determined that interruptions during the core workday were preventing them from
having concentrated time for their long-term projects. They reconfigured their
furniture so a "receptionist" prevented drop-in visitors from interrupting all
of the staff. Staff members rotated into the "receptionist" role and addressed
visitors´ questions, so that others in the department were not disturbed and
customers were still supported. Professional staff also began rotating
responsibility to answer the telephone. Now everyone in the department has
uninterrupted time to focus on longer-term projects by avoiding constant
interruptions. Customer requests are still addressed on a timely basis, and HR
staff members feel more job satisfaction and less stress. They are working more
efficiently and reducing their overtime hours.
The
Presenting Problem.
A finance staff person was frustrated by constant
interruptions breaking his concentration on detail work.
Solution:
This finance staff person
now puts masking tape on the flashing red voice mail indicator light on his
telephone. He realized that the light was a distraction and kept him from
concentrating on his work. He now returns his calls at several periods
throughout the day instead of having frequent interruptions during his peak
productivity time.
The
Presenting Problem.
CE managers are required to travel extensively to
cover their territory, attend corporate meetings, and meet with customers. This
takes them away from the office and away from home frequently.
Solution:
A Customer Engineering
division schedules quarterly off-sites to begin at noon so that staff travel in
the morning and avoid an extra night away from home. They have agreed to work
through dinner to cover the agenda. They prefer this schedule to taking an
extra night away from home. Travel costs have been reduced for the business
while employee satisfaction has increased.
Â
     In order for ReInventing Work to be implemented successfully in an organization we have learned the following:
·       Â
HR staff need to have change management skills,
knowledge of systemic processes, work-redesign experience, and the personal or
role power to influence change in their organization.
·       Â
it is important to foster a partnership between line
managers and Human Resources staff for change to occur. Line managers are
feeling the pain personally. They have a business challenge, like the new
expectations of CEs, or they have trouble recruiting or retaining staff, like
the sales organization. This pain motivates them to take action. Even the most
persuasive and influential Human Resources staff have had difficulty "selling"
the tool to their managers if their managers were not personally introduced to
it as a business solution rather than as a human resource program. It needs to
be approached as a continuous learning process not a training session.
·       Â
measurable results along with anecdotal evidence are
necessary to demonstrate the bottom-line benefits of the ReInventing Work
process.
The
Presenting Problem:
An on-going challenge as a consultant is to minimize excessive travel.
We have tried to apply the ReInventing Work process to ourselves. We are based
in the San Francisco area. We submitted a proposal to a company in Boston. They
called to let us know that they had received 70 proposals and we were one of
four firms they wanted to interview. Our interview was scheduled next Thursday
at 2 p.m. We were delighted to be selected but we were not enthusiastic about
traveling across country for a one-hour interview. To be cost effective as well
as support our personal needs, we suggested that we rent Kinkos video
teleconference facilities and they could interview us using this new
technology. We were competing against large and well-known consulting firms and
we were selected because we are asking new kinds of questions. We are not doing
our work in a knee jerk automatic fashion any longer. We are stopping to ask if
a decision or a strategy makes good business sense at the same time that it
supports our needs as people.
The
Presenting Problem:
A client wanted us to do 20 focus groups in four
states within a month´s time. We love doing focus groups, but we do not enjoy
spending a month traveling to four states. We took a few minutes to brainstorm
with the client´s project manager. A win-win solution emerged. We designed a
train the focus group facilitator course. Traveled to each state once to
conduct the training. The client selected 16 employees who were delighted to be
provided with professional growth. They ended up conducting 63 focus groups.
The client obtained richer data; they now have the internal capacity to do
focus groups whenever they need to. We made just about as much money because we
designed and delivered the course. It was a true win-win. This solution emerged
because, once again, we were willing to ask new kinds of questions. We were
willing to explore new ways to conduct business that would also support the
personal needs of our staff.
Conclusion:
ReInventing Work is a systemic tool to help
individuals, co-workers, managers and organizations learn how to structure work
and create cultures that support the three bottom lines: shareholder value, and
customer and employee satisfaction. By using the new tools of examining
traditional assumptions and habitual work processes you to can create win-win
situations for your organization and yourself.
Visit our web site at www.ArtemisManagement.com to learn
more details about our ReInventing Work process. You too can move your
organization beyond policy and program into real systemic change that benefits
shareholders, customers and employees.